The FDIC has denied reports that any potential buyer of Signature Bank would be required to divest its crypto activities. They have recently commented on the receivership of a bank. A spokesperson initially said they couldn’t comment, but a different spokesperson later said that the receivership will not end until all the bank’s assets are sold and all the claims against the bank are addressed. This means that the acquirer of the bank will decide the conditions of their bid. The FDIC is responsible for protecting the deposits of customers in the event of a bank failure, and this receivership is an example of their commitment to ensuring the safety of customers’ funds.

The FDIC, Office of the Controller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve have jointly stated that banks are not prohibited or discouraged from providing services to any sector. When an FDIC-insured bank fails, the acquirer must tell the FDIC what assets and liabilities it is willing to take. This allows the FDIC to ensure that the failed bank’s customers are taken care of and that the assets are transferred to a safe and reliable institution. Banks are encouraged to provide services to any sector, and the FDIC is there to ensure that the process is done safely and securely.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has stated that it will not require divestment of cryptocurrency activities as part of any sale. This is a major development for the cryptocurrency industry, as it means that banks and other financial institutions can now engage in cryptocurrency activities without fear of being forced to divest them. This could open the door for more banks to enter the cryptocurrency space, which could lead to greater adoption and use of digital currencies. It also provides more clarity for banks and other financial institutions that are considering entering the cryptocurrency space. This could be a major step forward for the cryptocurrency industry and could help to further legitimize it.”

The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) seized Signature Bank over the weekend, turning it over to the FDIC. This move was possibly caused by an anti-crypto sentiment, according to Barney Frank, a board member of Signature Bank. However, an NYDFS spokesperson said the regulator had lost confidence in the bank’s leadership after a bank run last Friday and a lack of reliable information. The FDIC is now looking to auction Signature and Silicon Valley Bank, another bank seized by a state regulator last week, possibly by the end of this week.

Previous articleFed’s Balance Sheet Expansion: Not QE
Next articleRisk Management Rules: Go Beyond the 2% Rule and Master Position Sizing with the All-New 1% Rule!
Avatar photo
Blockchain has been an integral part of my life, having witnessed its various cycles of tech and adoption explosions, bulls and bears at different times, glad to be on this exciting ride and will continue to play my part to help some of you navigating the space.